READ about Piers Morgan's long career in journalism here.
On Wednesday evening, Piers Morgan sat down with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in Washington D.C., for a rare and enlightening interview. Joined by Professor Bryan A. Garner, the co-author of the new book "Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts," Scalia discussed his interpretation of the confrontation clause.
As a "textualist" (also known as an "originalist,") Scalia believes that American law should "be based on the text of the Constitution, reasonably interpreted" and he applied that principle to the confrontation clause, brought up in the 1990 case of "Maryland v. Craig." The case involved a young girl who had been abused by a child molester and later testified through closed-circuit television.
Scalia argued that the procedure was "virtually constitutional" and not "actually constitutional" because the girl did not appear in court, and according to the constitutional clause, the abuser had a right to be face-to-face with his victim in the courtroom. "The confrontation clause, in some situations, does seem to be unnecessary," explained Scalia. "But there it is. And its meaning could not be clearer. You are entitled to be confronted with the witnesses against you."
"I do not always like the result," added Scalia, regarding his resolve to uphold the textual interpretation of the Constitution. "Very often, I think the result is terrible. But that's not my job. I'm not king. And I haven't been charged with making the Constitution come out right all the time."
Inviting the "Piers Morgan Tonight" host inside the Supreme Court, Scalia also talked about the criticism judges face for voting down a political line. "It offends me," said the Court's longest-serving justice, regarding accusations of partisanship.
"They [Supreme Court justices] are voting their politics, not because they are voting for the Republicans or voting for the Democrats. It's because they have been selected by the Republicans or selected by the Democrats precisely because of their judicial philosophy."
Charged with carrying the entire hour, Morgan and his guest later shared a lighthearted moment, as the conversation turned to the justice's hunting excursion with former Vice President Dick Cheney.
When Morgan joked that Scalia had "lived to tell the tale," referring to the 2006 incident when Cheney accidentally shot and wounded a campaign contributor during a weekend quail hunt, Scalia laughed, adding: "Dick Cheney is a very good wing shot."
Watch the clips, and listen to the interview, for a revealing look inside the Supreme Court, featuring unparalleled access to a man described as "the intellectual anchor of the Court's conservative wing."
• Follow Piers Morgan Tonight on Twitter
What a smoothy, all purring and smiley and he is known as a toughy, his sort of style is what people talk of when they disparage charm, these charmers seem to promise gentleness, atentiveness and consideration and such but their charm is really no indication of any such thing, it is just the best possibly face for the moment. Scalia does not seem to have any doubts about things that are of the type that would worry others such as making a child face her rapist. rose macaskie madrid.
Justice Scalia says that "more discussion in the election" is the same as "more money in the election" , but he's forgetting that you cannot bribe people with discussion. They are not the same, and Ciizens United is a bona-fide travesty, as 60% of the electorate will tell you.
Piers play nice, leave Cheney alone. You took 2 jags in one sentence.Scalia just admit to Piers you got something for going hunting.:)
Piers i bet you would have loved to break that story wide open.
Notify me of new comments via email.